bison football73 wrote:Region 3
1. Velva
2. Rugby
3. Harvey/WC
4. Berthold/OR
5. Williams County
6. Bottineau
7. Des-Lacs/Burlington
8. Surrey
Indy5 wrote:bison football73 wrote:Region 3
1. Velva
2. Rugby
3. Harvey/WC
4. Berthold/OR
5. Williams County
6. Bottineau
7. Des-Lacs/Burlington
8. Surrey
Rugby will be better than Velva next year. I don't know about Harvey, but Velva will be worse than this year because their offesnse was dependent on Barstad and now he's gone.
ibison football73 wrote:Who do you think surrey is going to beat?
Sniper wrote:Region 4:
1. Hazen- Have a lot of returning players from a championship team, should run away with this region.
2. Killdeer- Always seem to have some big players up front.
3. New Salem- Don't think they will be much better but the region won't be near as deep.
4. Central McLean- Had good nine-man teams in the past few years.
5. Southern McLean- Young team.
6. Heart River- Lost a lot, rebuilding year.
7. Garrison/Max- Change in regions won't make any difference.
8. Standing Rock- 0-8 last year.
Surrey75 wrote:ibison football73 wrote:Who do you think surrey is going to beat?
I'm not sure who we'll beat as I'm not really familiar with the 11 man teams I just don't see us being last in the region. As for Dye I believe he played 11 man back in idaho. And he will have yet another huge line to run behind.
bison football73 wrote:Region 4:
Oh man Heart River at 6? Yes they lost a lot but a number on people said Hazen would be rebuilding this year. Not the case. Heart river still has hlebechuk and 54 on the line (Leblanc I think). They have a confusing offense that hides the ball carrier well I just don't see them being that low. I also don't see New Salem finishing at 3. They lose Heins who is their best runner and best passer. (Played some qb out of a shotgun) do they still have that 21 (don't remember his name) if they do that is their only hope.
bison football73 wrote:Sniper wrote:Region 4:
1. Hazen- Have a lot of returning players from a championship team, should run away with this region.
2. Killdeer- Always seem to have some big players up front.
3. New Salem- Don't think they will be much better but the region won't be near as deep.
4. Central McLean- Had good nine-man teams in the past few years.
5. Southern McLean- Young team.
6. Heart River- Lost a lot, rebuilding year.
7. Garrison/Max- Change in regions won't make any difference.
8. Standing Rock- 0-8 last year.
Oh man Heart River at 6? Yes they lost a lot but a number on people said Hazen would be rebuilding this year. Not the case. Heart river still has hlebechuk and 54 on the line (Leblanc I think). They have a confusing offense that hides the ball carrier well I just don't see them being that low. I also don't see New Salem finishing at 3. They lose Heins who is their best runner and best passer. (Played some qb out of a shotgun) do they still have that 21 (don't remember his name) if they do that is their only hope.
Packers52 wrote:Region 2
I think it two tiers;
1st Tier:
1. Larimore
2. North Praire
3. MPCG
2nd Tier:
4. Midway
5. Langdon
6. Lakota
7. Park River
8. North Border
Larimore still has its Defensive and Offensive line intact. They lost some good seniors but the core is still their! Can't wait for next season!
spartan11 wrote:Packers52 wrote:Region 2
I think it two tiers;
1st Tier:
1. Larimore
2. North Praire
3. MPCG
2nd Tier:
4. Midway
5. Langdon
6. Lakota
7. Park River
8. North Border
Larimore still has its Defensive and Offensive line intact. They lost some good seniors but the core is still their! Can't wait for next season!
I am not sure how involved in the region you are but I think you only got one spot right and thats larimore
d_fense wrote:Their picks are not that much different than yours spartan11. Like I said, Park River was to low and Midway to high. You did have four of the eight teams in the same spots as he did. IMO that is not that different.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests