klg_11 wrote:i dont know if it is like this everywhere in ND. but i know willistons code of conduct makes a tobacco violation the same as a illegal consumption of alcohol violation. if the coach sees u off season, out in public with chew. DONE.
siouxfan4life wrote:Rehak is definately one of the top 3 defensemen in the state. Is he the best that is hard to say. I would say ladoucer, galbreath, and him are very close.
gfhockey wrote:klg_11 wrote:gfhockey wrote:all that matters is the east 4 west 0
alright post number 87 using the same words. why even talk if thats all u ever bring up. thats the only answer u have to everything.
classy
Alright post number 79. You same the same thing over and over.
BTW, I know a number of RR players last year that chewed while playing. When i reffed, they were spittin out colored saliva. at first i thought it was blood but it was snoose juice.
ndfootball wrote:siouxfan4life wrote:Rehak is definately one of the top 3 defensemen in the state. Is he the best that is hard to say. I would say ladoucer, galbreath, and him are very close.
Rehak is a good player, but after watching hockey this weekend Ladoucer and Galbreath are better than Rehak. And Wurden didnt really stick out in the games that I watched but if he has a chance of being drafted he is definetly the best in the state.
ledahl14 wrote:ndfootball wrote:siouxfan4life wrote:Rehak is definately one of the top 3 defensemen in the state. Is he the best that is hard to say. I would say ladoucer, galbreath, and him are very close.
Rehak is a good player, but after watching hockey this weekend Ladoucer and Galbreath are better than Rehak. And Wurden didnt really stick out in the games that I watched but if he has a chance of being drafted he is definetly the best in the state.
just cuz he's gettin drafted doesn't really make him the best in the state, he's a senior so they offered him a spot since he'll be done w/ school next year and he plays for south which gets him looked at more rehak could still be the best in the state but playin for williston hes gonna get watched less and in the red river vs. williston game i thought ladoucer and galbreath played good together cuz they've prbly been D partners for a long time but individually i'd say rehak is much better plus his D partner got kicked off so he didn't have him to work with
highheat wrote:shouldnt matter if he's a junior or not. if he is as good as he's being talked up to be, he'd be getting looks from teams at the next levels.
Ditka14 wrote:highheat wrote:shouldnt matter if he's a junior or not. if he is as good as he's being talked up to be, he'd be getting looks from teams at the next levels.
he proboly doesn't know you can play juniors while still being in high school
ironrange wrote:Speaking of defensemen I would like to know how hendrickson from minot makes all-state and heth from bottineau dosn't after heth was the only defense that was a unanimous pick for west region. And i think that hendrickson only had like 6 points for the season and heth had somewhere in the 20s i think and i know points aren't everything but heth was sollid at D too.
ndfootball wrote:ironrange wrote:Speaking of defensemen I would like to know how hendrickson from minot makes all-state and heth from bottineau dosn't after heth was the only defense that was a unanimous pick for west region. And i think that hendrickson only had like 6 points for the season and heth had somewhere in the 20s i think and i know points aren't everything but heth was sollid at D too.
Because Hendrickson was a beast over the middle. And Im almost positive that Hendrickson was an unanimous selection for west region.
Well look at Grant Kovacs..he didn't go to state and he made the team when there was a lot of good goalies in the tournament.Ditka14 wrote:Hendrickson went to state, thats why i could see heath not getting the nomination.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests