winner-within wrote:I thought I liked it for the first couple of years in R2 but in the end it hasn't done anything to enhance the game and all the focus is on a couple 3 programs and I have a feeling it always will be.....
winner-within wrote:I thought I liked it for the first couple of years in R2 but in the end it hasn't done anything to enhance the game and all the focus is on a couple 3 programs and I have a feeling it always will be.....
Flip wrote:winner-within wrote:I thought I liked it for the first couple of years in R2 but in the end it hasn't done anything to enhance the game and all the focus is on a couple 3 programs and I have a feeling it always will be.....
how do you fix it?
Flying Wallenda wrote:winner-within wrote:I thought I liked it for the first couple of years in R2 but in the end it hasn't done anything to enhance the game and all the focus is on a couple 3 programs and I have a feeling it always will be.....
What? Please explain...........
winner-within wrote:Flying Wallenda wrote:winner-within wrote:I thought I liked it for the first couple of years in R2 but in the end it hasn't done anything to enhance the game and all the focus is on a couple 3 programs and I have a feeling it always will be.....
What? Please explain...........
the argument or lets say the fun part of debate used to involve 4 districts and now its 2 Regions up and down the Valley and a lot of teams from middle to bottom of the Totem pole are getting zero recognition.....
for the players on those teams, I'm sure they would love to go back to playing some teams 3 times maybe even 4 just to have an opportunity to improve their records..... and they I'm sure they really miss the District tournament where there at least was some recognition regardless of record
scc wrote:It was a huge mistake to get rid of the districts in regions 1, 2, and 7.
What should have been the fix:
Go back to the way it was only a decade earlier, which was a single-elimination district tournament. The worst thing they ever did was make it double-elimination.
What is not the fix:
Getting rid of districts.
scc wrote:It was a huge mistake to get rid of the districts in regions 1, 2, and 7.
What should have been the fix:
Go back to the way it was only a decade earlier, which was a single-elimination district tournament. The worst thing they ever did was make it double-elimination.
What is not the fix:
Getting rid of districts.
scc wrote:Flip wrote:scc wrote:It was a huge mistake to get rid of the districts in regions 1, 2, and 7.
What should have been the fix:
Go back to the way it was only a decade earlier, which was a single-elimination district tournament. The worst thing they ever did was make it double-elimination.
What is not the fix:
Getting rid of districts.
There would be a lot of "championship games" in the semi final round if you ask me.
Let me rephrase. Go back to the way it was only a decade earlier, which was a single-elimination district tournament in the first round. The top 4 teams still moved on to the region tournament.
winner-within wrote:I also believe that if it is going to be a super region than all teams have to play 2 times....or all teams only play one time
Flip wrote:winner-within wrote:I also believe that if it is going to be a super region than all teams have to play 2 times....or all teams only play one time
Why? It feels like you're complaining just to complain. In region 2 that would be 24 games if you made everyone play twice.
winner-within wrote:I'm not worried about how it feels flip.....and I realize playing 2 times is not feasible.... but if teams are going to play 2 times from the old districts of 3 and 4 than just have districts....
Flip wrote:winner-within wrote:I'm not worried about how it feels flip.....and I realize playing 2 times is not feasible.... but if teams are going to play 2 times from the old districts of 3 and 4 than just have districts....
That's more of the north district in R2. The south district does a lot less of the playing the old district teams twice. I don't think Thompson plays anyone twice.
Flip wrote:winner-within wrote:I'm not worried about how it feels flip.....and I realize playing 2 times is not feasible.... but if teams are going to play 2 times from the old districts of 3 and 4 than just have districts....
That's more of the north district in R2. The south district does a lot less of the playing the old district teams twice. I don't think Thompson plays anyone twice.
woodchuck10 wrote:From what I’ve heard in District 8 is that as long as we have at least 6 teams we will keep the district tournement. The way I see it is that SJ, Rolla, Rolette, North Star, Langdon, and now Dunseith has a lot of history and districts sort of bring us as all together much better than a single elimination play in game featuring Langdon at Harvey or Dakota Prairie at Dunseith ever could.
The district 8 tournement has been packed on championship night every night since we’ve moved to 6 teams. I hope districts never go away. Every team gets a tournement atmosphere before the single elimination Regional. Langdon is a great venue for a district tournement and in Dunseith they bring the best High School band in state from Belcourt in to town they get the gym rockin.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests