madseason wrote:I think they should have a few east teams play the closest west teams Away one year home the next, then a few other teams the next year. This way you can get a better idea of the strength of east and west by common opponents. I think it would make the seedings more accurate.defensewinsgames wrote:madseason wrote:I've got to go with Langdon on the turf by a touchdown or maybe 2. Should be a great game, good luck to both teams they are the two best in the state and deserve to be there. For the most part I like the seeding for playoffs (could use a little tweaking IMO but it worked this year)
I agree that the seeding worked well this year. It isn't a perfect system but the top 2 teams in the state are meeting in the championship and that is a huge win in my books.
defensewinsgames wrote:I like this idea for that first non-region game. It would help with having common opponents for seeding but would also end a lot of the discussion/guess work that goes into which side of the state is best.
NDPREP wrote:AA did this until recently when they bumped the teams back down, they basically had a non region game partner from the opposite region.
lovwatchingsports wrote:Good idea until you start adding in the fuel ect ect ect
winner-within wrote:@ Halftime
HCV 8
Langdon 6
Flip wrote:defensewinsgames wrote:I like this idea for that first non-region game. It would help with having common opponents for seeding but would also end a lot of the discussion/guess work that goes into which side of the state is best.
I think the west is the best. You think east is the best. Does that matter?NDPREP wrote:AA did this until recently when they bumped the teams back down, they basically had a non region game partner from the opposite region.
Very easy to do with 2 regions.
madseason wrote:Langdon should have won that game. I don't know what happened on the forth and inches play at the 1 yd line? Not what was supposed to happen I take it. If they scored on that drive they would have won. Hillsboro did a great job at stopping the Langdon run game. Langdon seemed a little out of sync, Have to give HCV pass rushers credit for that. All in all a great game. Congrats to both teams on great seasons.
Cause they lost by two, If they scored on that drive they would have won by 4 or more.Flying Wallenda wrote:madseason wrote:Langdon should have won that game. I don't know what happened on the forth and inches play at the 1 yd line? Not what was supposed to happen I take it. If they scored on that drive they would have won. Hillsboro did a great job at stopping the Langdon run game. Langdon seemed a little out of sync, Have to give HCV pass rushers credit for that. All in all a great game. Congrats to both teams on great seasons.
Ok, I’ll take the bate. Explain to me why Langdon should have won? Cause the TO on the 1?
madseason wrote:Cause they lost by two, If they scored on that drive they would have won by 4 or more.Flying Wallenda wrote:madseason wrote:Langdon should have won that game. I don't know what happened on the forth and inches play at the 1 yd line? Not what was supposed to happen I take it. If they scored on that drive they would have won. Hillsboro did a great job at stopping the Langdon run game. Langdon seemed a little out of sync, Have to give HCV pass rushers credit for that. All in all a great game. Congrats to both teams on great seasons.
Ok, I’ll take the bate. Explain to me why Langdon should have won? Cause the TO on the 1?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests