.ndlionsfan wrote:Central McLean, maybe, but Turtle Lake/Mercer had a lot of good teams back in the day as well.
Teams that always seem to be in the playoffs are Divide County and Napolean, along with Linton and Cavalier when they've been in 9man. Like someone said before, wherever Regent seems to go there has been a lot of football success. Other teams that have had a lot of success TGU, Wyndmere-Lidgerwood and Edgeley-Kulm.
Bacon wrote:Shiloh is very far from what I would consider a class B 9-man school. When you can draw kids from a 70,000 population city and every other team draws from 700, I would call that an advantage. They just have to limit enrollment to stay class B and they are golden. I'm sure some on here will defend them, but to say that they don't have a large advantage is just not looking at the facts. It would be like Century limiting enrollment and playing class B.
Bacon wrote:Shiloh is very far from what I would consider a class B 9-man school. When you can draw kids from a 70,000 population city and every other team draws from 700, I would call that an advantage. They just have to limit enrollment to stay class B and they are golden. I'm sure some on here will defend them, but to say that they don't have a large advantage is just not looking at the facts. It would be like Century limiting enrollment and playing class B.
Bigbrew22 wrote:But would a transfer from Century have to sit out a year if they decided to go to Shilo. Assuming the parents already live in Bismarck. I don't know but I wouldn't think they'd have to sit a year?
Bigbrew22 wrote:Ok Maybe I shouldn't have said transfer. I'll try again what if the player decided to enroll in Shilo at the beginning of the new year and they live in Bis. Would that be considered a transfer? Or is a transfer switching schools during the year?
NoDakinSouth wrote:Private schools do well because their parents put a premium on their child's performance in schools, paying for tuition and camps. Many of the "normal" Class B schools have a majority of parents that aren't involved in their child's education or extracurricular activities. Private schools have parents that are very involved by definition.
With the rules and penalties against recruiting, it doesn't enter into the equation except at a young age and doesn't generally effect elite athletes.
classB4ever wrote:NoDakinSouth wrote:Private schools do well because their parents put a premium on their child's performance in schools, paying for tuition and camps. Many of the "normal" Class B schools have a majority of parents that aren't involved in their child's education or extracurricular activities. Private schools have parents that are very involved by definition.
With the rules and penalties against recruiting, it doesn't enter into the equation except at a young age and doesn't generally effect elite athletes.
Referring to the above bold statement: Could you supply where you got that information from? Thank you.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests