ndlionsfan wrote:If Freije doesn't play, Northstar wins by 20.
ndlionsfan wrote:If Freije doesn't play, Northstar wins by 20.
winner-within wrote:ndlionsfan wrote:If Freije doesn't play, Northstar wins by 20.
yep
noles4ever wrote:And Heisler got in foul trouble, and 2 of north stat's big three had below average games but hagler had a big one, and from the lakota-edmore perspective they would say the reffing was in ns favor. The game was played on Lakota-Edmore's home court, next rematch would be neutral.
All this game proved is that NS is 11 pts better playing a lakota-edmore team without freije.
To be honest, I think this game proved nothing without both teams at full strength. North Star wanted to face Lakota-Edmore at full strength and I am sure that Freiji wanted to play.
Everyone is looking to regionals for a rematch but honestly they might not see each other again. Rolette, rolla, four winds, and carrington all might have something to say about that.
As a class b fan of boys and girls I think we would all like to see this rematch on the big stage but as they say "any given sunday".
Of note, North Star did have a 20 pt lead in the mid 4th but L-E made a comeback proving that basketball is truly a game of runs, and whoever puts together the most runs usually wins. I love listening to Mark Beighley on the radio if I can't be there, but Kulland did an awesome job last night.
noles4ever wrote:Read carefully, North-Star wanted to play Lakota-Edmore when Lakota-Edmore WAS AT FULL STRENGTH, sorry I didn't spell it out for you.
Read into it whatever you want. Doesn't mean anything until March 10th, 11th, and 13th.
noles4ever wrote:Hold on there Wallenda, you totally took what I said the wrong way, if you are going to read like a 6th grader, I must dumb down my writing for your 6th grade mentality.
And where did I ever say anything that you implied in your last post with being the only person to ever see a basketball game, YIKES. Wow, you and winner just might be the same person. On edge much?
noles4ever wrote:listened, kvilvang was 5-6 pts below her average and heisler sat for a long period of time and was 10-11 pts below her average. Those stats are not indicative of stellar performances.
Flippant remark due to the fact you attacked me in the post before when I gave my analysis.
In the end this game means nothing come march even if you want to blow it into a huge moral victory for Lakota-Edmore.
You need to take your medication.
noles4ever wrote:listened, kvilvang was 5-6 pts below her average and heisler sat for a long period of time and was 10-11 pts below her average. Those stats are not indicative of stellar performances.
noles4ever wrote:listened, kvilvang was 5-6 pts below her average and heisler sat for a long period of time and was 10-11 pts below her average. Those stats are not indicative of stellar performances.
Flippant remark due to the fact you attacked me in the post before when I gave my analysis.
In the end this game means nothing come march even if you want to blow it into a huge moral victory for Lakota-Edmore.
You need to take your medication.
DiggerDan wrote:What last night shows is that without Freije, LE is a pretty decent team, but not the caliber of North Star.
I've watched LE play many times. With Freije, they are a completely different outfit. They are much better defensively and in transition. LE will play almost exclusively man, not the zone they sat in last night for much of the game. That doesn't mean North Star won't be able to score, I suspect with their athletes they would prefer playing against man. But it will be a different game for both.
Offensively, LE will be totally different as well, but not necessarily better. LE last night showed very good ball movement in their half court offense and were able to get good looks on most possessions. That they were hitting them was the reason they stayed close thru 3 quarters. With Freije, you may not see that. Sometimes the rest of the team depends too much on Fallyn and the offense bogs down. It will be interesting to see how playing this stretch of games without her affects the group when she returns.
It was a fun game to watch. Was very impressed again with Sarah Hagler, as I have been every time I've seen her over the past 3 years. A tremendous athlete. It's fun to watch kids from other teams as they develop through the years - you don't see them as much so their growth really jumps out at you.
noles4ever wrote:Asking redundant questions and making statements like
"stop posting like a 6th grader"
"you aren't the only person who's attended a basketball game in your life"
and
"don't write like a girl"
are not exactly complimentary. I know mental health is a serious issue, but seriously, stay on your meds, please.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests