SCC wrote:I wouldn't mind a shot clock, but I wonder how much it would really help boost scoring. Teams that want to slow things down would still be able to eat up most of the time on the shot clock...if they can get a good shot before the clock runs out.
No offense here SCC, but if you go with tradition, there would be no 3 point shot, and look what that did, and do you or do you not think the shot clock has helped class A? Yes going for the last shot of the game, for overtime, u can take it down to the last second, and sometimes get lucky or execute just at the right time, but if u do that all game with a clock, your fg percentages would go lower, as opposed to having a shot clock where u take the first good shot opportunity. With class B to me the only downfall is the descrepancy between a real good team and a real bad team could lead to 60-70 pt differentials.SCC wrote:Trinity ran over 50 seconds off before the game winning shot in last year's state championship game. While I was pulling for May-Port CG to win the game, it didn't bother me that Trinity ran off all that time because it's part of the game. Sometimes it doesn't work to a team's advantage, as was the case when May-Port CG faced Carrington in the state semifinals in 1995 and slowed the game down with over three minutes left. Carrington came back and won because of some key steals, and they would go on to win the state title. I guess I'd like to stick with tradition.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests