carrington vs harvey

by **cash** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:03 am

now that carrington has beat midkota, and harvey beat midkota also, what are your predictions on this game coming up on the 6th in carrington

by **fightingsioux20** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:36 am

should be a good game but harvey has tanner lorenz who has been playing really good it should be a close one

by **ClassBballa** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:48 am

should be pretty close. If either team gets in foul trouble with their big men it could mean trouble. tanner has been really good as of late. carrington has some kids with hops so harvey has to keep them off the offensive boards. I think if either team can hit some threes and extend the defense they will get better looks inside too and will have a better shot of winning.

by **cash** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:21 am

i think harvey has the better shot, they match up better i think, harveys game is down low and so is carringtons, and i think harveys down low game is better than carringtons, so ur right, fouls are the key, but i think harvey wins it by 10

by **rumbles** » Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:53 am

I think it will come down to the last 10 seconds like the Carrington Midkota game did.
But right now I think Harvey has a slight edge.

by **cash** » Sun Feb 04, 2007 5:14 am

rumbles wrote:I think it will come down to the last 10 seconds like the Carrington Midkota game did.
But right now I think Harvey has a slight edge.

harvey does have some momentum, every since their good game against wells co. they have stepped it up but still havent played a game that their capable of, this could be the time to have that game

by **cash** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:35 pm

only 16 hours til gametime, what are some predictions?

by **berry186** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:37 pm

cash wrote:only 16 hours til gametime, what are some predictions?

they play at 11 or what

by **baseball** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:38 pm

yea whats up with that?

by **cash** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:45 pm

hahaha, my bad, i meant 26 hours, that would put the time at 715 or so, my bad guys

by **fightingsioux20** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:36 pm

Carrington by 5-8

by **sodadrinker** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:15 pm

im feeling harvey, cuz skadberg isnt used to people that can out jump him and nyhus can get up quite a bit higher and tanner is just to big down low. carrington also has no one that can guard block unless van ray gets away with his hands on cheap, pushy defense

by **cash** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:11 pm

sodadrinker wrote:im feeling harvey, cuz skadberg isnt used to people that can out jump him and nyhus can get up quite a bit higher and tanner is just to big down low. carrington also has no one that can guard block unless van ray gets away with his hands on cheap, pushy defense

harvey also should be able to press because of carringtons lack of ball handling, this could be a blow out just because harvey matches up great against them

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:16 pm

I dont think it will be a blowout. Especially this far into the schedule and its being played in Carrington.. It should be a good game.

by **sodadrinker** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:18 pm

i dont see a blow out happening either. carrington can be a pretty tough place to play. i might be wrong but i think theyre undefeated at home this year.

by **cash** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:21 pm

sodadrinker wrote:i dont see a blow out happening either. carrington can be a pretty tough place to play. i might be wrong but i think theyre undefeated at home this year.

hahaha, harvey is undefeated on the road this year, thats a little weird huh, but your right, it will be a good game, when i meant blowout i was overdoing it, im thinking a game from 1-10 pt spread

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:22 pm

sodadrinker wrote: i might be wrong but i think theyre undefeated at home this year.

According to ndhsaa.com they are 6-0 at home.

by **fruit snack** » Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:07 am

harveys big guys with the combination of block will be to much for carrington to stop, harvey runs away with it

by **cash** » Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:35 am

fruit snack wrote:harveys big guys with the combination of block will be to much for carrington to stop, harvey runs away with it

im beginnning to agree and think that, im gonna say harvey 65- carrington 52

by **rumbles** » Tue Feb 06, 2007 4:56 pm

Carrington- 54 Harvey-45

It was close at the end of the half but Carrington ran away with it in the second. Lorenze was not much of a factor.

by **cash** » Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:25 pm

rumbles wrote:Carrington- 54 Harvey-45

It was close at the end of the half but Carrington ran away with it in the second. Lorenze was not much of a factor.

carrington played good, harvey didnt have the refs on their sides and that hurt them very very very much

by **rumbles** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:45 pm

cash wrote:
rumbles wrote:Carrington- 54 Harvey-45

It was close at the end of the half but Carrington ran away with it in the second. Lorenze was not much of a factor.
carrington played good, harvey didnt have the refs on their sides and that hurt them very very very much

The refs were not on anobody's side. they made some poor calls for both teams. Carrington may have gotten more breaks but it didn't hurt Harvey that bad.

by **cash** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:08 pm

rumbles wrote:
cash wrote:
rumbles wrote:Carrington- 54 Harvey-45

It was close at the end of the half but Carrington ran away with it in the second. Lorenze was not much of a factor.
carrington played good, harvey didnt have the refs on their sides and that hurt them very very very much
The refs were not on anobody's side. they made some poor calls for both teams. Carrington may have gotten more breaks but it didn't hurt Harvey that bad.

lorenz had 3 calls that were awful, faul didnt do anything a lot of his fouls, nyhus's werent always fouls, they didnt call over and back like 2 times on carrington, they never called any carries on carrington, fouls down low when they were guarding harveys big guys, horrible display of reffing

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:49 pm

I like how guys are always quick to jump on refs because THEY lost. The refs aren't playing the game, and the refs didnt make you lose the game by 9 pts!

by **rumbles** » Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:01 pm

cash wrote:
rumbles wrote:
cash wrote:
rumbles wrote:Carrington- 54 Harvey-45

It was close at the end of the half but Carrington ran away with it in the second. Lorenze was not much of a factor.
carrington played good, harvey didnt have the refs on their sides and that hurt them very very very much
The refs were not on anobody's side. they made some poor calls for both teams. Carrington may have gotten more breaks but it didn't hurt Harvey that bad.
lorenz had 3 calls that were awful, faul didnt do anything a lot of his fouls, nyhus's werent always fouls, they didnt call over and back like 2 times on carrington, they never called any carries on carrington, fouls down low when they were guarding harveys big guys, horrible display of reffing

The calls down low were equally as bad for carrington. There were several times carrington would block a shot cleanly and they would call it a foul.

carrington vs harvey

Who is online