1-29-07 Polls

by **Flyer** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 8:52 am

What will the polls look like tonight???

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:13 am

Parshall will be out after losing to New Town.

by **Flyer** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 11:31 am

Here is what I think..N.D. Class B poll

1. Lisbon

2. Killdeer

3. Hazen

4. Hankinson

5. Watford City

6. Minnewaukan-Leeds

7. Linton

8. Four Winds

9. Buelah

10. Dickinson Trinity and Minot Ryan

by **windex** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 12:13 pm

Next few games Beulah (note spelling) play:

at home Linton 1/30,

at home Killdeer 2/1,

at Dickinson Trinity 2/6

at Hazen 2/13 then finish up with

at home Garrison 2/16

and then at Minot Ryan 2/17

Time will tell if Beulah should be rated, but how's that for a schedule

by **crazy** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:36 pm

windex wrote:Next few games Beulah (note spelling) play:

at home Linton 1/30,

at home Killdeer 2/1,

at Dickinson Trinity 2/6

at Hazen 2/13 then finish up with

at home Garrison 2/16

and then at Minot Ryan 2/17

Time will tell if Beulah should be rated, but how's that for a schedule

why do they play hazen again? Just a rival thing so they both get to play at home verse each other?

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 3:49 pm

1/29/2007:

1 Lisbon (8) 12-0 96 1

2 Killdeer (2) 13-1 84 2

3 Hazen 11-1 70 3

4 Hankinson 14-0 69 4

5 Minnewaukan-Leeds 13-1 56 5

6 Watford City 12-1 48 6

7 Beulah 11-2 26 7

8 Linton 13-2 22 10

9 Dickinson Trinity 11-2 18 9

10 Four Winds 12-1 11 10

TIE Park River 13-1 11 NR

TIE Steele-Dawson 11-1 11 8

Others Receiving Votes: North Border (10-2), Midway-Minto (10-2), Grafton (10-3), Bishop Ryan (10-2), Westhope-Newburg (11-2), Parshall (12-3), Kindred (10-4), Standing Rock (9-3), May-Port CG (8-4), Richardton-Taylor (10-3).

by **windex** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:38 pm

Beulah plays Hazen again ... fill the schedule one reason. Good gate another reason.... This one doesn't count as a District game.

by **feeshattack** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 6:40 pm

beaulah does have one tough schedule. that might prepare them well for playing tough teams during the district and regional tourneys.

by **north_border_eagles2106** » Mon Jan 29, 2007 9:34 pm

may port cg still receiving votes seems odd after losing to two district opponents, central valley and larimore. they are a good team but i would think two losses like that would drop them off the polls for awhile

by **Indians Alumni** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:59 am

Here we go again, another lovely week! I see alot of 2 loss teams are still higher than 1 loss teams

by **nativegolfer** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:06 am

Here's how I would do it:

1. Lisbon

2. Hankinson

3. Killdeer

4. Hazen

5. M-L

6. Watford City

7. FW

8. Park River

9. Steele Dawson

10. Linton

by **PA42** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:13 am

north_border_eagles2106 wrote:may port cg still receiving votes seems odd after losing to two district opponents, central valley and larimore. they are a good team but i would think two losses like that would drop them off the polls for awhile

mayport cg lost to hatton-northwood and larimore two of the top teams in the district. I would agree with you but the impressive defeated over a good kindred team without lorenz proves that they should at least get votes. I would say they are one of the favorites in the district. They have played a brutal non district schedule.

by **PA42** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 4:14 am

native golfer i agree with, but i woulc not put park river in the top ten. They will be tough around regionals, but right now they are not the best team in district 4.

by **thesports_guy32** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 6:37 am

park river will not be in the championship game and they will not fair well in regionals... teams will stop Moe and that will stop park river... remember this, as Moe goes- so does park river

by **baseball** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:13 am

nativegolfer wrote:Here's how I would do it:

1. Lisbon

2. Hankinson

3. Killdeer

4. Hazen

5. M-L

6. Watford City

7. FW

8. Park River

9. Steele Dawson

10. Linton

the only thing i would change would to flip Killdeer and Hankinson and Linton and Steele-Dawson.

by **NDSUBison** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:15 am

The only thing is, i'm sure people realize that the key to beating Park River is to stop Moe. So, if that's the case, then why have they only lost one game? The have beaten two out of the top three teams in their district so far and show signs of doing something special this year. They did lose to Midway-Minto when it counted and haven't played North Border this year, but don't say they won't do much in regionals. They have as good as chance as the rest of district 4

by **indiandrumhopper** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:54 am

I think alot of these teams that are above for winds are over rated because when it come tournment time anything could happen, just ask sheyenne minn.

by **thesports_guy32** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:59 am

of course the teams above four winds are overrated.

by **baseball** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:15 am

indiandrumhopper wrote:I think alot of these teams that are above for winds are over rated because when it come tournment time anything could happen, just ask sheyenne minn.

oh god....that jsut sparked a 4 page agruement

by **NATURAL TALENT** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:24 am

indiandrumhopper wrote:I think alot of these teams that are above for winds are over rated because when it come tournment time anything could happen, just ask sheyenne minn.

So because you lose a game, your over rated? The SM team you are talking about was 23-1 going into the regional champ. game, they lost to a WC team that shot 70% from the field that nite. Thats an over rated team? So what if Four Winds loses in the District, over rated? I bet you didnt think of that did you.

by **north_border_eagles2106** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:38 am

...........BURN!!!

by **baseball** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:52 am

NATURAL TALENT wrote:
indiandrumhopper wrote:I think alot of these teams that are above for winds are over rated because when it come tournment time anything could happen, just ask sheyenne minn.

So because you lose a game, your over rated? The SM team you are talking about was 23-1 going into the regional champ. game, they lost to a WC team that shot 70% from the field that nite. Thats an over rated team? So what if Four Winds loses in the District, over rated? I bet you didnt think of that did you.

yea...he wins

by **The Schwab** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:57 am

I think that we should just start a new topic (class b boys bball) and title it Four Winds.....because everytime there is a topic talking about anything to do with their basketball team the topic turns into about how they are the best team in ND, and the people who come up with the polls know nothing about basketball....i have no problem with people saying that your team is a good team....but it doesnt need to be brought up in every discussion...please?

by **Bearsfan** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:31 am

baseball wrote:
nativegolfer wrote:Here's how I would do it:

1. Lisbon

2. Hankinson

3. Killdeer

4. Hazen

5. M-L

6. Watford City

7. FW

8. Park River

9. Steele Dawson

10. Linton

the only thing i would change would to flip Killdeer and Hankinson and Linton and Steele-Dawson.

Lets see.... Hazen beat Killdeer...... Linton beat Steel dawson..... why are they turned around then?

You guys kill me with your reasoning..... oh well..... everyone call the voters and tell them to vote 4w #1 so we can at least go throught the rest of the year in peace. I still think that 2 loses or not..... you can be rated above someone with no loses. They even do it in the BSC ratings in major college football and basketball...... ask Boise state!!!

by **baseball9** » Tue Jan 30, 2007 9:37 am

what's going on with thompson basketball???????????

1-29-07 Polls

Who is online