hoophoophoop wrote:My vote would be Yankton
defensewinsgames wrote:The most compelling argument for Yankton is the undefeated record this year during which he beat Hurlburt and Enderlin, beat Brandt and Beulah (by 15), beat Trinity (by 20), beat Shiloh (by 20), beat HCV (by 31), beat Rugby (by 17), beat Oak Grove (by 20). And is headed to the state tournament while Brandt and Hurlburt aren't (yes I know it has a lot to do with the team around them). I'm not sure what the stats were when he went head to head with Hurlburt and Brandt so maybe that would change my opinion a little I guess. But based on that I would side with hoop....I would probably vote Yankton.
defensewinsgames wrote:The most compelling argument for Yankton is the undefeated record this year during which he beat Hurlburt and Enderlin, beat Brandt and Beulah (by 15), beat Trinity (by 20), beat Shiloh (by 20), beat HCV (by 31), beat Rugby (by 17), beat Oak Grove (by 20). And is headed to the state tournament while Brandt and Hurlburt aren't (yes I know it has a lot to do with the team around them). I'm not sure what the stats were when he went head to head with Hurlburt and Brandt so maybe that would change my opinion a little I guess. But based on that I would side with hoop....I would probably vote Yankton.
maddog1971 wrote:Well....
Another way to look at it. You have other really great players in this state that have sacrifice their stat line for the good of the team. So I think how many victories the team has and the success of the team they play for should make a difference. Joe has made it to one regional final and has been playing for 6 years. Yes he has filled the stat sheet but his teams do not win in the games that count.
Brandt has been to state but they have not won it....
Yankton has had his teams at the top of the state each year and has played with some great players. For the last two years it would be hard to argue against him.
maddog1971 wrote:what is FWM record for the same time frame... I know they lost twice last year but honestly they did not even try in the 3rd place game.
Who knows what Joe would have averaged(Brandt would have had him playing a post and dominating for sure) and to me it honestly doesn't matter to me when your team isn't winning and advancing. Brandt and Yankton have earned that.
Not trashing on Joe just saying I think that winning and moving on has to be part of it. and He has not done that. As I said I have watched many players do what their team needs to win. One night they have 35 and 1 assist and 4 rebounds. The next night they might have 6 points 8 assists and 14 boards.... Or they forget even shooting for the whole game and play shut down defense and rebound. Those players get no love and they should.
maddog1971 wrote:Well....
Another way to look at it. You have other really great players in this state that have sacrifice their stat line for the good of the team. So I think how many victories the team has and the success of the team they play for should make a difference. Joe has made it to one regional final and has been playing for 6 years. Yes he has filled the stat sheet but his teams do not win in the games that count.
Brandt has been to state but they have not won it....
Yankton has had his teams at the top of the state each year and has played with some great players. For the last two years it would be hard to argue against him.
balla45 wrote:Finally, the easy argument against really anyone, for me at least, is quite simple. Joe Hurlburt is a lot better at basketball than anyone else that is up for the award, and there are some pretty impressive talents up for the award. I am not intending to take a shot at anyone else either.
classB4ever wrote:balla45 wrote:Finally, the easy argument against really anyone, for me at least, is quite simple. Joe Hurlburt is a lot better at basketball than anyone else that is up for the award, and there are some pretty impressive talents up for the award. I am not intending to take a shot at anyone else either.
I can agree or understand your reasoning for your entire post, except this portion. Joe's achievements are remarkable and he certainly is deserving of any awards moving forward. With that said, his physical stature is a very important part of his accomplishments. Saying he is "a lot better at basketball than anyone else that is up for the award" is where I get stuck and will continue to debate.
balla45 wrote:
It does not matter if he is only good because he is 6'11" and has a better basketball body than everyone else does. He still has that body and no one else does. I do not think he is only good because he is 6'11", but if someone does feel that way, it is irrelevant. Size matters in basketball. Bryer Kaczynski, who I am a fan of by the way, plays in the same region and is 6'11" in socks with a 7'2" wingspan. He averaged 12.3 points, 8.9 rebounds, and 2 blocks this season.
Also, food for thought. There are several other 6'9"+ players in ND now and there obviously have been dozens over the course of ND history. No one has the statistical accomplishments that he has, if you only want to compare him to tall people.
In Class A, Ryan Erikson was the rebound leader. He is 6'10". I have heard several people state, well he should do that, he is 6'10". Well, he still did it.
Would Trey Brandt or Jayden Yankton be better than Joe Hurlburt if either of them had a comparable body? I am not sure, because they do not play in a 6'11" body. Whether it is fair or unfair, it just is reality.
balla45 wrote:I think the best basketball player is the player who can most impact winning at the high level. I think that player is Joe Hurlburt. I can explain that in significant detail if anyone would like.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests