Page 7 of 8

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:15 pm
by stir the pot
40 fouls or more on one team and one kid shoots 26 free throws
5 Ts and 2 ejection and this is a JV game !!!
Have already heard a RUMOR that some New Town players did not have their correct uniforms on
How does New Town schedule 21 games? Look on NDHSAA website

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:59 pm
by Jack8
aNDkid91 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
NodakQ2 wrote:Rough night/week for those teams in the polls:

*Stanley gets beat twice.
*Grafton gets beat.
*Shiloh gets beat.
*Bottineau gets beat.
*RV New Town also got beat.

I think we'll see at least a couple new teams "in" next week.



New Town did not lose.
There JV lost to TLM
They do have a game against Shiloh on Saturday though so there still is a chace, either way someone on the polls will be down a game


New town sat 3 starters yes, but they still played 2 starters and the game was part of the varsity schedule so I don’t know how they’re considering it a jv game. If all 5 starters got hurt and couldn’t play that wouldn’t make it a jv game. To me it should still count as a loss on their varsity record. Correct me if I’m way off here


The two starters your referring to one is a freshman the other a junior. New Town sat 5 players all seniors 3 starters and the 6th and 7th guy off the bench. And if it was varsity vs varsity we woundnt be taking about this as i believe New Town would have crushed TLM.
TLM barley got passsed new towns jv with even though new towns jv had 40 plus fouls called on them.


So was there an actual JV game?


Yes. There was a normal 4 quarter jv game before the varsity game


Then this game was a varsity game Jack8. Just because your coach decided to sit the 3 starters & the 6th/7th guys off the bench does not mean it was a JV game. Take your loss with a little class.


It was a JV game talk to the AD at new town and turlte lake im sure you can get all your answers from them on why it was a JV game.
The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.
And last it was new towns C squad that played before there JV that night .

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 2:11 pm
by Flip
Jack8 wrote:The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.

Even if New Town considers it a JV game no player can play on more than 19 dates.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:07 pm
by The Schwab
I don't believe that's right, 6 quarters times how many games you play. I don't think it matters what dates.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:10 pm
by scc
The Schwab wrote:I don't believe that's right, 6 quarters times how many games you play. I don't think it matters what dates.

You're right. The limit is 6 quarters in a day, and you can't go over 114 quarters for the regular season if you play in a district format.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:21 pm
by Brody N
Jack8 wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
NodakQ2 wrote:Rough night/week for those teams in the polls:

*Stanley gets beat twice.
*Grafton gets beat.
*Shiloh gets beat.
*Bottineau gets beat.
*RV New Town also got beat.

I think we'll see at least a couple new teams "in" next week.



New Town did not lose.
There JV lost to TLM
They do have a game against Shiloh on Saturday though so there still is a chace, either way someone on the polls will be down a game


New town sat 3 starters yes, but they still played 2 starters and the game was part of the varsity schedule so I don’t know how they’re considering it a jv game. If all 5 starters got hurt and couldn’t play that wouldn’t make it a jv game. To me it should still count as a loss on their varsity record. Correct me if I’m way off here


The two starters your referring to one is a freshman the other a junior. New Town sat 5 players all seniors 3 starters and the 6th and 7th guy off the bench. And if it was varsity vs varsity we woundnt be taking about this as i believe New Town would have crushed TLM.
TLM barley got passsed new towns jv with even though new towns jv had 40 plus fouls called on them.


So was there an actual JV game?


Yes. There was a normal 4 quarter jv game before the varsity game


Then this game was a varsity game Jack8. Just because your coach decided to sit the 3 starters & the 6th/7th guys off the bench does not mean it was a JV game. Take your loss with a little class.


It was a JV game talk to the AD at new town and turlte lake im sure you can get all your answers from them on why it was a JV game.
The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.
And last it was new towns C squad that played before there JV that night .


I really feel TLMM wouldn't play Jacobs if it was a "JV" game, averages over 23 and is considered one of the top juniors in the state (prep hoops dakotas rankings) Might as well say the Standing Rock game was JV too. I get that New Town played jv players but that does not make it a JV game or TLMM wouldn't have scheduled it because they only have 19 games scheduled. To you first sentence, i might just go do that and see what they have to say.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:26 pm
by scc
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
NodakQ2 wrote:Rough night/week for those teams in the polls:

*Stanley gets beat twice.
*Grafton gets beat.
*Shiloh gets beat.
*Bottineau gets beat.
*RV New Town also got beat.

I think we'll see at least a couple new teams "in" next week.



New Town did not lose.
There JV lost to TLM
They do have a game against Shiloh on Saturday though so there still is a chace, either way someone on the polls will be down a game


New town sat 3 starters yes, but they still played 2 starters and the game was part of the varsity schedule so I don’t know how they’re considering it a jv game. If all 5 starters got hurt and couldn’t play that wouldn’t make it a jv game. To me it should still count as a loss on their varsity record. Correct me if I’m way off here


The two starters your referring to one is a freshman the other a junior. New Town sat 5 players all seniors 3 starters and the 6th and 7th guy off the bench. And if it was varsity vs varsity we woundnt be taking about this as i believe New Town would have crushed TLM.
TLM barley got passsed new towns jv with even though new towns jv had 40 plus fouls called on them.


So was there an actual JV game?


Yes. There was a normal 4 quarter jv game before the varsity game


Then this game was a varsity game Jack8. Just because your coach decided to sit the 3 starters & the 6th/7th guys off the bench does not mean it was a JV game. Take your loss with a little class.


It was a JV game talk to the AD at new town and turlte lake im sure you can get all your answers from them on why it was a JV game.
The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.
And last it was new towns C squad that played before there JV that night .


I really feel TLMM wouldn't play Jacobs if it was a "JV" game, averages over 23 and is considered one of the top juniors in the state (prep hoops dakotas rankings) Might as well say the Standing Rock game was JV too. I get that New Town played jv players but that does not make it a JV game or TLMM wouldn't have scheduled it because they only have 19 games scheduled. To you first sentence, i might just go do that and see what they have to say.

Go look at the schedule. http://www.northdakotapreps.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=13670

There are around 20 or so varsity vs. JV matchups. This is nothing new.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:38 pm
by Brody N
scc wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
NodakQ2 wrote:Rough night/week for those teams in the polls:

*Stanley gets beat twice.
*Grafton gets beat.
*Shiloh gets beat.
*Bottineau gets beat.
*RV New Town also got beat.

I think we'll see at least a couple new teams "in" next week.



New Town did not lose.
There JV lost to TLM
They do have a game against Shiloh on Saturday though so there still is a chace, either way someone on the polls will be down a game


New town sat 3 starters yes, but they still played 2 starters and the game was part of the varsity schedule so I don’t know how they’re considering it a jv game. If all 5 starters got hurt and couldn’t play that wouldn’t make it a jv game. To me it should still count as a loss on their varsity record. Correct me if I’m way off here


The two starters your referring to one is a freshman the other a junior. New Town sat 5 players all seniors 3 starters and the 6th and 7th guy off the bench. And if it was varsity vs varsity we woundnt be taking about this as i believe New Town would have crushed TLM.
TLM barley got passsed new towns jv with even though new towns jv had 40 plus fouls called on them.


So was there an actual JV game?


Yes. There was a normal 4 quarter jv game before the varsity game


Then this game was a varsity game Jack8. Just because your coach decided to sit the 3 starters & the 6th/7th guys off the bench does not mean it was a JV game. Take your loss with a little class.


It was a JV game talk to the AD at new town and turlte lake im sure you can get all your answers from them on why it was a JV game.
The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.
And last it was new towns C squad that played before there JV that night .


I really feel TLMM wouldn't play Jacobs if it was a "JV" game, averages over 23 and is considered one of the top juniors in the state (prep hoops dakotas rankings) Might as well say the Standing Rock game was JV too. I get that New Town played jv players but that does not make it a JV game or TLMM wouldn't have scheduled it because they only have 19 games scheduled. To you first sentence, i might just go do that and see what they have to say.

Go look at the schedule. http://www.northdakotapreps.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=13670

There are around 20 or so varsity vs. JV matchups. This is nothing new.


I see. Thanks scc... alright Jack, you're right.. TLMM is no good, New town would have crushed them, and Jacobs' 50 is tainted. Just feel New town bacekers would not have made such a big deal of it if they would have won. We will see how both teams do around tournament time and that might tell us a little more.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 3:48 pm
by Flip
The Schwab wrote:I don't believe that's right, 6 quarters times how many games you play. I don't think it matters what dates.

scc wrote:You're right. The limit is 6 quarters in a day, and you can't go over 114 quarters for the regular season if you play in a district format.

This may be correct, my AD told me no player on our team could play on more dates than we had varsity games scheduled. So if we had 21 varsity games scheduled we couldn't have a player play on all those 21 dates plus a JV/C squad tournament. We don't have districts.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:08 pm
by Jack8
Brody N wrote:
scc wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
aNDkid91 wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
Brody N wrote:
Jack8 wrote:
NodakQ2 wrote:Rough night/week for those teams in the polls:

*Stanley gets beat twice.
*Grafton gets beat.
*Shiloh gets beat.
*Bottineau gets beat.
*RV New Town also got beat.

I think we'll see at least a couple new teams "in" next week.



New Town did not lose.
There JV lost to TLM
They do have a game against Shiloh on Saturday though so there still is a chace, either way someone on the polls will be down a game


New town sat 3 starters yes, but they still played 2 starters and the game was part of the varsity schedule so I don’t know how they’re considering it a jv game. If all 5 starters got hurt and couldn’t play that wouldn’t make it a jv game. To me it should still count as a loss on their varsity record. Correct me if I’m way off here


The two starters your referring to one is a freshman the other a junior. New Town sat 5 players all seniors 3 starters and the 6th and 7th guy off the bench. And if it was varsity vs varsity we woundnt be taking about this as i believe New Town would have crushed TLM.
TLM barley got passsed new towns jv with even though new towns jv had 40 plus fouls called on them.


So was there an actual JV game?


Yes. There was a normal 4 quarter jv game before the varsity game


Then this game was a varsity game Jack8. Just because your coach decided to sit the 3 starters & the 6th/7th guys off the bench does not mean it was a JV game. Take your loss with a little class.


It was a JV game talk to the AD at new town and turlte lake im sure you can get all your answers from them on why it was a JV game.
The reason why it was a JV game was because they had 21 games scheduled and had to drop 2 games the other was the tioga game.
And last it was new towns C squad that played before there JV that night .


I really feel TLMM wouldn't play Jacobs if it was a "JV" game, averages over 23 and is considered one of the top juniors in the state (prep hoops dakotas rankings) Might as well say the Standing Rock game was JV too. I get that New Town played jv players but that does not make it a JV game or TLMM wouldn't have scheduled it because they only have 19 games scheduled. To you first sentence, i might just go do that and see what they have to say.

Go look at the schedule. http://www.northdakotapreps.com/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=13670

There are around 20 or so varsity vs. JV matchups. This is nothing new.


I see. Thanks scc... alright Jack, you're right.. TLMM is no good, New town would have crushed them, and Jacobs' 50 is tainted. Just feel New town bacekers would not have made such a big deal of it if they would have won. We will see how both teams do around tournament time and that might tell


I dont think i said TLMM wasnt any good. I just think new town is better then them. Nobody made a deal about it until you did and if the jv wouldve won noboby would have said anything about it cause it was just another game. And last what does waiting around until tournament time even mean? As far as im concern you cant compare region 5 to region 8 this year.
In region 5 TLMM should make it to the region finals agaisnt Shiloh. Once there anything can happen as they have shown last year. I hope they do make it again it was a good story last year

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2018 10:44 pm
by Run4Fun2009
TENTH POLL
Monday, February 12th

1. St. John (16) 17-0 177
2. Hillsboro-Central Valley (1) 16-1 162
3. Thompson (1) 16-2 140
4. Oak Grove 16-2 115
5. Stanley 15-2 98
6. Bishop Ryan 16-2 95
7. Wyndmere-Lidgerwood 15-2 46
8. Beulah 14-3 42
9. New Town 16-2 40
10. Grafton 15-3 33
Others Receiving Votes: Carrington (15-2), Dunseith (13-4), Shiloh Christian (12-5), Our Redeemer's (14-2), Maple Valley (14-2).

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:15 pm
by Edger
I don't see how Orcs, never hit the poll again. Their only 2 losses were to RV Shiloh, early in the season when Shiloh was rated and to Bishop Ryan who was ranked well all season long and they beat Beulah.

Stanley plays Kenmare at home for the number 1 seed in Districts tonight. Imo, if they lose they should drop to RV.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:27 pm
by packers21
Edger wrote:I don't see how Orcs, never hit the poll again. Their only 2 losses were to RV Shiloh, early in the season when Shiloh was rated and to Bishop Ryan who was ranked well all season long and they beat Beulah.

Stanley plays Kenmare at home for the number 1 seed in Districts tonight. Imo, if they lose they should drop to RV.


The top 10 private quota is 2

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:30 pm
by airmail
packers21 wrote:
Edger wrote:I don't see how Orcs, never hit the poll again. Their only 2 losses were to RV Shiloh, early in the season when Shiloh was rated and to Bishop Ryan who was ranked well all season long and they beat Beulah.

Stanley plays Kenmare at home for the number 1 seed in Districts tonight. Imo, if they lose they should drop to RV.


The top 10 private quota is 2


:lol:

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:36 pm
by Edger
Run4Fun2009 wrote:FOURTH POLL
Tuesday, January 2nd

1. Bishop Ryan (4) 5-0 157
2. Stanley (12) 5-0 152
3. St. John 7-0 123
4. Hillsboro-Central Valley (1) 5-0 122
5. Thompson 5-1 95
6. Grafton 6-0 81
7. Shiloh Christian 4-1 68
8. Oak Grove 4-1 45
9. Our Redeemer's 5-0 36
10. Maple Valley 5-0 15
Others Receiving Votes: Wyndmere-Lidgerwood (4-0), New Town (4-0), Mohall-Lansford-Sherwood (5-0), Richland (5-0), Solen (6-0), Carrington (3-2), Dickinson Trinity (4-3), Bottineau (5-1), Beulah (3-3), Des Lacs-Burlington (3-3).


Packers21 -- Were that a thing, but its not... :wink:

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 12:56 pm
by scc
Edger wrote:I don't see how Orcs, never hit the poll again. Their only 2 losses were to RV Shiloh, early in the season when Shiloh was rated and to Bishop Ryan who was ranked well all season long and they beat Beulah.

Stanley plays Kenmare at home for the number 1 seed in Districts tonight. Imo, if they lose they should drop to RV.

The season isn't over.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:39 pm
by Jack8
Edger wrote:I don't see how Orcs, never hit the poll again. Their only 2 losses were to RV Shiloh, early in the season when Shiloh was rated and to Bishop Ryan who was ranked well all season long and they beat Beulah.

Stanley plays Kenmare at home for the number 1 seed in Districts tonight. Imo, if they lose they should drop to RV.


If ORCS wins all 3 of there games this week they should be in the last poll teams they have to beat this week Bottineau,Velva and Stanley 3 tough teams.
Also #8 Beulah plays # 9 New Town one of them with be taking a L giving ORCS a chance to move up

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:19 pm
by NodakQ2
I could see Carrington and maybe Dunseith moving in to the poll this week...

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:54 pm
by Run4Fun2009
ELEVENTH POLL
Monday, February 19th

1. St. John (11) 19-0 127
2. Hillsboro-Central Valley (2) 19-1 119
3. Oak Grove 17-2 96
4. Stanley 17-2 82
5. Thompson 17-3 79
6. Bishop Ryan 17-2 73
7. Wyndmere-Lidgerwood 17-2 44
8. Carrington 17-2 38
9. Grafton 17-3 35
10. Dunseith 15-4 11
Others Receiving Votes: New Town (16-3), Beulah (16-4), Our Redeemer's (16-3).

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 2:06 pm
by winner-within
FIRST POLL
Monday, December 11th

1. Stanley (8) 1-0 120
2. Shiloh Christian (2) 1-0 98
3. Beulah (2) 0-0 95
4. Bishop Ryan 1-0 92
5. Carrington 0-0 62
6. Thompson (1) 0-0 57
7. St. John 1-0 55
8. Grafton 1-0 52
9. Oak Grove 0-0 48
10. Hillsboro-Central Valley (1) 1-0 42

ELEVENTH POLL
Monday, February 19th

1. St. John (11) 19-0 127
2. Hillsboro-Central Valley (2) 19-1 119
3. Oak Grove 17-2 96
4. Stanley 17-2 82
5. Thompson 17-3 79
6. Bishop Ryan 17-2 73
7. Wyndmere-Lidgerwood 17-2 44
8. Carrington 17-2 38
9. Grafton 17-3 35
10. Dunseith 15-4 11....


still 7 of the original 10 in it but a little bit of rearranging to say the least.....with one unbeaten and one with one loss I still say this year is not near as cut and dried as the past has been..

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:26 pm
by CentralCity
winner-within wrote:FIRST POLL
Monday, December 11th

1. Stanley (8) 1-0 120
2. Shiloh Christian (2) 1-0 98
3. Beulah (2) 0-0 95
4. Bishop Ryan 1-0 92
5. Carrington 0-0 62
6. Thompson (1) 0-0 57
7. St. John 1-0 55
8. Grafton 1-0 52
9. Oak Grove 0-0 48
10. Hillsboro-Central Valley (1) 1-0 42

ELEVENTH POLL
Monday, February 19th

1. St. John (11) 19-0 127
2. Hillsboro-Central Valley (2) 19-1 119
3. Oak Grove 17-2 96
4. Stanley 17-2 82
5. Thompson 17-3 79
6. Bishop Ryan 17-2 73
7. Wyndmere-Lidgerwood 17-2 44
8. Carrington 17-2 38
9. Grafton 17-3 35
10. Dunseith 15-4 11....


still 7 of the original 10 in it but a little bit of rearranging to say the least.....with one unbeaten and one with one loss I still say this year is not near as cut and dried as the past has been..

8 out of the 10 actually. Which is pretty impressive. You could definitely make an argument for all 10.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2018 8:27 pm
by winner-within
CentralCity wrote:
winner-within wrote:FIRST POLL
Monday, December 11th

1. Stanley (8) 1-0 120
2. Shiloh Christian (2) 1-0 98
3. Beulah (2) 0-0 95
4. Bishop Ryan 1-0 92
5. Carrington 0-0 62
6. Thompson (1) 0-0 57
7. St. John 1-0 55
8. Grafton 1-0 52
9. Oak Grove 0-0 48
10. Hillsboro-Central Valley (1) 1-0 42

ELEVENTH POLL
Monday, February 19th

1. St. John (11) 19-0 127
2. Hillsboro-Central Valley (2) 19-1 119
3. Oak Grove 17-2 96
4. Stanley 17-2 82
5. Thompson 17-3 79
6. Bishop Ryan 17-2 73
7. Wyndmere-Lidgerwood 17-2 44
8. Carrington 17-2 38
9. Grafton 17-3 35
10. Dunseith 15-4 11....


still 7 of the original 10 in it but a little bit of rearranging to say the least.....with one unbeaten and one with one loss I still say this year is not near as cut and dried as the past has been..

8 out of the 10 actually. Which is pretty impressive. You could definitely make an argument for all 10.


and now? ....the term of the season where polls get flushed down the Commode :)

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:18 pm
by B-oldtimer
When regions are over at most is you will be getting only 5 out the 10 in the poll to state. I wouldn't be surprised if we see only 3 of these teams reach the state tournament. I look at where some of these teams could be beat by teams not in current poll. Its not the important poll now the poll that means most is how are these teams going to fare in there regional tournament.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 5:05 pm
by scc
The final poll isn't out, yet. We'll see if things change much.

Re: 2017-18 Polls

PostPosted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:33 pm
by NodakQ2
Things are gonna change! :shock: