State Tourney Statistics

[Run4Fun2009]

Stats for ENTIRE STATE TOURNEY

Points - Min. 40
Zack Schmidt (Flasher) 72
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 71
Brad Heidlebaugh (Rugby) 62
Christian Adams (Oak Grove) 60
Brock Robbins (Cavalier) 60
Casey Walcker (Beulah) 51
Ryan Chrest (Cavalier) 49
Christian Kvilvang (North Star) 48
Taylor Krenz (Flasher) 47
Cole Messerschmidt (Beulah) 45
Alex Weston (North Star) 44
Andrew Small (Linton-HMB) 42
Joe Baker (New Town) 41
Ryan Schneider (Linton-HMB) 40
Jonathon Purintun (Linton-HMB) 40

Rebounds - Min. 20
Nick Card (Oak Grove) 43
Brad Heidlebaugh (Rugby) 38
Ryan Schneider (Linton-HMB) 28
Brandon Braun (Flasher) 28
Coulton Dangerfield (Oak Grove) 27
Alex Weston (North Star) 23
Daryl Grady (New Town) 23
Elijah Grady (New Town) 23
Zach Miller (Rugby) 21
Christian Kvilvang (North Star) 20
Austin Bernhardt (Linton-HMB) 20

3's Made - Min. 7
Cole Messerschmidt (Beulah) 13
Taylor Krenz (Flasher) 12
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 10
Tanner Bernhardt (Rugby) 8
Andrew Small (Linton-HMB) 8
Joe Baker (New Town) 7

FT Made - Min. 10
Christian Adams (Oak Grove) 23
Zack Schmidt (Flasher) 19
Brad Heidlebaugh (Rugby) 14
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 13
Ryan Schneider (Linton-HMB) 12
Ryan Chrest (Cavalier) 11
Taylor Krenz (Flasher) 11

Assists - Min. 8
Joe Baker (New Town) 18
Jett Hettich (Beulah) 12
Johnathon Purintun (Linton-HMB) 11
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 10
Nick Card (Oak Grove) 9
Randi Julson (Beulah) 8
Johnny Heisler (North Star) 8

Field Goal Percentage - min. 45% & 25 attempts
Brad Heidlebaugh (Rugby) 23-40: 57%
Casey Walcker (Beulah) 23-40: 57%
Zack Schmidt (Flasher) 26-48: 54%
Daryl Grady (New Town) 14-26: 53%
Brock Robbins (Cavalier) 24-48: 50%
Cole Messerschmidt (Beulah) 16-33: 48%
Christian Kvilvang (North Star) 18-38: 47%
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 24-52: 46%
Alex Weston (North Star) 19-42: 46%
Zach Miller (Rugby) 16-35: 46%
Johnathon Purintun (Linton-HMB) 15-32: 46%

3-Point Percentage - min. 38% & 10 attempts
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 10-16: 62%
Cole Messerschmidt (Beulah) 13-22: 59%
Taylor Krenz (Flasher) 12-26: 46%
Christian Adams (Oak Grove) 5-11: 45%
Andrew Small (Linton-HMB) 8-18: 44%
Brock Robbins (Cavalier) 5-13: 38%
Wayne Fox (New Town) 5-13: 38%

Free Throw Percentage - min. 67% & 9 attempts
Carter Kretchman (Oak Grove) 13-13: 100%
Taylor Krenz (Flasher) 11-12: 92%
Ryan Chrest (Cavalier) 11-14: 79%
Brad Heidlebaugh (Rugby) 14-18: 78%
Zack Schmidt (Flasher) 19-27: 70%
Christian Adams (Oak Grove) 23-34: 68%
Jaedon Haman (Rugby) 8-12: 67%

[Run4Fun2009]

State Tourney Team Statistics...via tourney stat sheets

Record
Oak Grove 3-0
Rugby 2-1
North Star 2-1
Cavalier 2-1
Linton-HMB 1-2
Beulah 1-2
Flasher 1-2
New Town 0-3

Points Scored/Game
Oak Grove 70.3
Flasher 62.3
Cavalier 61.7
Rugby 58.7
Linton-HMB 56.7
New Town 55.0
North Star 52.0
Beulah 52.0

Points Allowed/Game
North Star 51.0
Beulah 52.7
Cavalier 55.0
Rugby 56.7
New Town 60.0
Linton-HMB 62.3
Oak Grove 63.7
Flasher 67.3

Field Goal Percentage
Cavalier 73-148: 49.3%
Beulah 64-140: 45.7%
North Star 65-143: 45.5%
Oak Grove 74-165: 44.8%
New Town 65-160: 40.6%
Flasher 65-162: 40.1%
Linton-HMB 64-170: 37.6%
Rugby 64-177: 36.2%

3-Point Percentage
Beulah 21-46: 45.7%
Oak Grove 17-39: 43.6%
Cavalier 9-25: 36.0%
Flasher 20-56: 35.7%
Linton-HMB 17-51: 33.3%
New Town 18-56: 32.1%
North Star 11-43: 25.6%
Rugby 14-65: 21.5%

Free Throw Percentage
Flasher 37-50: 74.0%
Rugby 34-48: 70.8%
Oak Grove 46-67: 68.7%
Cavalier 30-47: 63.8%
New Town 17-28: 60.7%
Linton-HMB 25-43: 58.1%
North Star 15-27: 55.6%
Beulah 7-17: 41.2%

Rebounds
New Town 113
Oak Grove 111
Rugby 92
Linton-HMB 89
North Star 80
Cavalier 79
Beulah 74
Flasher 68

Assists
Oak Grove 36
Beulah 36
Rugby 34
Cavalier 34
New Town 30
Linton-HMB 27
Flasher 24
North Star 23

Steals
Cavalier 33
Rugby 23
Flasher 23
New Town 21
Oak Grove 18
North Star 18
Beulah 18
Linton-HMB 17

Turnovers
Rugby 24
North Star 29
Cavalier 30
Oak Grove 31
Flasher 32
Linton-HMB 35
Beulah 42
New Town 55

[Hinsa]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

[RebelsThunder]

Does anyone know how many blocks Alex Weston from NS had?

[ndlionsfan]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

They should feel very fortunate of where they ended up. Could have easily been playing for 7th with those stats. I think they had the fewest turnovers so that helped.

[Run4Fun2009]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

They should feel very fortunate of where they ended up. Could have easily been playing for 7th with those stats. I think they had the fewest turnovers so that helped.

They were settling a lot in the first two games when NT & NS played zone and they just weren't falling.

[Indy5]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

Like Run said they faced a lot of zone. I'd also say its just because half their scorers are purely shooters and they happened to just not shoot that well. They kept shooting because that's what got them there, and I think that's what they needed to do. Just didn't get them to fall.

[ndlionsfan]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

Like Run said they faced a lot of zone. I'd also say its just because half their scorers are purely shooters and they happened to just not shoot that well. They kept shooting because that's what got them there, and I think that's what they needed to do. Just didn't get them to fall.

Even against a zone, if you have good ball movement you should still be attacking the basket with the drive or hitting cutters inside for some better shots. With shooting the least amount of FT of any team, they weren't attacking as much as they could have, especially if the outside shots aren't falling.

[Run4Fun2009]

What do you make of the fact that Rugby had the poorest 3pt FG % - 21.5% - yet shot the most 3's - 65?

Like Run said they faced a lot of zone. I'd also say its just because half their scorers are purely shooters and they happened to just not shoot that well. They kept shooting because that's what got them there, and I think that's what they needed to do. Just didn't get them to fall.

Even against a zone, if you have good ball movement you should still be attacking the basket with the drive or hitting cutters inside for some better shots. With shooting the least amount of FT of any team, they weren't attacking as much as they could have, especially if the outside shots aren't falling.

They settled A LOT for the outside shot...especially when OT came and they got down in the Title. First two or three didn't go and OG started to score. When a team of HS kids panic...they tend to start chucking the least likely shot to go down.