Whos The New Number One?

by **cdub1** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:22 pm

skoal_24 wrote:
O_Snap wrote:If Belcourt makes top 5 the ranking system is a joke haha

BELCOURT BEAT MANDAN HA HA THATS NOT A JOKE ITS THE TRUTH

belcourt did beat mandan that is the truth what are you trying to say though?

by **O_Snap** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:32 pm

Number 1 will be Dickinson

by **skoal_24** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:33 pm

O_Snap wrote:Skoal you create hostility in here.....

how can u say i create hostility in here u are just mad that mandan lost to belcourt so just exept it when belcourt losses i exept it you are just making a big deal out of nothing osnap!!

by **O_Snap** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:34 pm

are you done yet skoal?......

by **cdub1** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:35 pm

skoal_24 wrote:
O_Snap wrote:Skoal you create hostility in here.....

how can u say i create hostility in here u are just mad that mandan lost to belcourt so just exept it when belcourt losses i exept it you are just making a big deal out of nothing osnap!!

you both create hostility cuz u argue with each other but continue as it is very funny and skoal get some new stuff to say we all know mandan beat belcourt

by **O_Snap** » Mon Jan 15, 2007 7:39 pm

I have been and still will be done talking about the Mandan Belcourt topics they locked the last one not for you to come in this one and post such things......

by **OkGo12** » Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:37 pm

your guys are dumb. . .yea belcourt beat mandan it's over now. . .it's behind them both teams forgot about it. . .only time there should be talkin' about these two teams again is when they play each other in Mandan. . .which won't be for awhile so both just quit it please. . .

The new number one will be Dickinson or Williston will remain #1. . .but there just polls ohwell

by **da_man 23** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 5:29 am

Is it possible for a team that is #1 to LOSE n still be #1? While the second seeded team won.....

by **hoopsfan_2007** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 9:56 am

da_man 23 wrote:Is it possible for a team that is #1 to LOSE n still be #1? While the second seeded team won.....

who cares really? poles are overrated!! the only pole that matters is the standings.

by **da_man 23** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 10:38 am

hoopsfan_2007 wrote:
da_man 23 wrote:Is it possible for a team that is #1 to LOSE n still be #1? While the second seeded team won.....

who cares really? poles are overrated!! the only pole that matters is the standings.

Stop hating hoopsfan....just cuz u got put in ur place on a prev thread cuz u thought u knew everything, all i did was ask a question. and if we r going by the standings....then dickinson is #1 according to the WDA website. Once again u were very mature about this, thanks.

by **666** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:38 pm

how can u not care about the EDC teams The EDC teams dominated the state tournament last year.

by **cdub1** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:45 pm

no they dint they north won but noone else really did alot

by **Ming01** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:05 pm

666 wrote:how can u not care about the EDC teams The EDC teams dominated the state tournament last year.

no they didnt

by **hoopsfan_2007** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:51 pm

Stop hating hoopsfan....just cuz u got put in ur place on a prev thread cuz u thought u knew everything, all i did was ask a question. and if we r going by the standings....then dickinson is #1 according to the WDA website. Once again u were very mature about this, thanks.

i'm not hating at all. if dickinson is #1 in the standings, then thats how it is. i wasnt making fun of your question about the poles, but wouldnt you agree that the standings are the really the only thing that matters. trying to jockey for a high seed so you can play a lower seen at WDA or EDC tourney.

i think williston and dickinson are both 5-1 in the west. so they are tied. actually, willston beat them, so technically they would be 1 in the west FYI.

by **hoopsfan_2007** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 4:52 pm

666 wrote:how can u not care about the EDC teams The EDC teams dominated the state tournament last year.

key words=last year

by **klg_11** » Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:27 pm

if i remember correctly in the top 4-5 last year only one was east and that was north, how is that a east domination?

by **Ming01** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:14 am

new poll is 1. Dickinson 2. Williston 3. Devils Lake 4.(tie) Bismarck 4.(tie) Shanley

by **vikes_fan** » Thu Jan 18, 2007 9:28 am

Ming01 wrote:new poll is 1. Dickinson 2. Williston 3. Devils Lake 4.(tie) Bismarck 4.(tie) Shanley

with west fargo and mandan receiving votes

by **LG_Shanley2007** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:43 am

Are you sure that Devils Lake is in that tie????? They just lost to South last night at their own house and Shanley beat GFRR in overtime.

by **Ming01** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 7:50 am

LG_Shanley2007 wrote:Are you sure that Devils Lake is in that tie????? They just lost to South last night at their own house and Shanley beat GFRR in overtime.

poll was before that game

by **Stromer** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:06 am

Ming01 wrote:
LG_Shanley2007 wrote:Are you sure that Devils Lake is in that tie????? They just lost to South last night at their own house and Shanley beat GFRR in overtime.

poll was before that game

And if you look closely, Shanley and Bismarck were in the tie, not DL.

by **LG_Shanley2007** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:29 am

Didn't even see that, sorry about that. So are Bismarck and Shanley now tied for 3rd, or does Shanley have that all to themselves??

by **Wild Wolves** » Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:02 pm

It is a poll, that means people vote on it. They will release another poll on the 23rd.

Whos The New Number One?

Who Will Be Number One Wednesday?

Who is online