Preps HOF

by **project-pat** » Sun Mar 25, 2007 7:28 pm

March 25th "Pat's HOF" inductees

1. bballer2 (274 posts)

2. Natural Talent (549 posts)

by **twiz11** » Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:02 pm

Another criteria should be the topics u started and how many posts there are in them... i believe I started the Four Winds topic and it is approaching 200 posts. I am not saying I deserve HOF status because I don't anywhere near the posts as some of these other ppl...

Just a Suggestion:D:)

by **knights4** » Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:15 pm

yeah but with all the 4 winds guys on this site, and the intense arguments everybody has about that team, it was pretty much a sure thing that it would get a lot posts, i'm not sure that, that should be part of the criteria for the hof, but that's just me

by **Weezy Baby** » Mon Mar 26, 2007 4:17 pm

twiz11 wrote:Another criteria should be the topics u started and how many posts there are in them... i believe I started the Four Winds topic and it is approaching 200 posts. I am not saying I deserve HOF status because I don't anywhere near the posts as some of these other ppl...

Just a Suggestion:D:)

haha ya but starting a 4winds topic? haha jk obviously there will be a ton of posts in their, they are very well represented on here haha.

by **project-pat** » Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:29 pm

I just added all my topics together and I have a total of 503 posts.

by **klg_11** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:35 am

project-pat wrote:
klg_11 wrote:
project-pat wrote:agreed, i say we just look at # of posts, length of membership, quality of posts, and your avatar.

so im screwed. come on pat.. can i at least be one if ur picks???

well your gettin up there in # of posts, you've been a member for over a year, your posts aren't bad, and i like the avatar, let's see how many nominations you get

well ill keep workin on the posts, but i heard crickets chripin while i was waitin on nominations..

by **knights4** » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:06 am

well at least the crickets had ur back

by **klg_11** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:11 am

knights4 wrote:well at least the crickets had ur back

ya they are usually always dependable to be there for you. its quite comforting

by **feeshattack** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:30 pm

project-pat wrote:March 25th "Pat's HOF" inductees

1. bballer2 (274 posts)

2. Natural Talent (549 posts)

how did bballer2 get in with only 274 posts??? are there some new rules??

by **feeshattack** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:34 pm

you should make a list of all the people that are in the HOF up to this date... since one hasnt been updated for awhile...

by **Mauer07** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:34 pm

ya i thought to be an All Pro you had to have atleast 500 posts and to be a hall of famer you have to have a 1000?

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:48 pm

1. lambboy
2. gator-nation
3. unc2
4. baller01
5. rebel
6. ming01
7. baseball
8. Weezy Baby
9. Grizz
10. Project-pat
11. cdub1
12. Rep
13. NDSportsFan
14. NDfan
15. West Dakota
16. Indians Alumni
17. Biggie
18. Point/Center
19. SCC
20. bballer2
21. Natural Talent
22. roughrider

In "pat's HOF" you don't need to be over 500 posts to get in. I put bballer2 in because, even though he only has 274 posts, they are loaded with insight and he has a good opinion on this site. My HOF is different than NDSportsfan's HOF.

by **The Schwab** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:52 pm

and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:53 pm

The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:

by **feeshattack** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:55 pm

very diapointed that i havent made ur hall of fame pat, im going to have to step it up, and get a few more posts in..... someday maybe

by **The Schwab** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:55 pm

project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:

no...actually i'm pretty sure i know why i'm not in

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:56 pm

The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:
no...actually i'm pretty sure i know why i'm not in

and what would that reason be?

by **The Schwab** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:57 pm

project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:
no...actually i'm pretty sure i know why i'm not in

and what would that reason be?

cause i have a tendency to get in very heated discussions on this site :)

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:58 pm

The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:
no...actually i'm pretty sure i know why i'm not in

and what would that reason be?
cause i have a tendency to get in very heated discussions on this site :)

nah that's not the reason. The heated discussions actually better the site I think....TO A POINT

by **The Schwab** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 3:01 pm

project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:
project-pat wrote:
The Schwab wrote:and the schwab is stumped as to why he hasnt made it yet....hahaha

I JUST STUMPED THE SCHWAB :banana:PEANUT BUTTER-JELLY TIME:banana:
no...actually i'm pretty sure i know why i'm not in

and what would that reason be?
cause i have a tendency to get in very heated discussions on this site :)

nah that's not the reason. The heated discussions actually better the site I think....TO A POINT

well then what is the reason....because i think i have some very good posts.......:)

by **grizz** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:14 pm

The Schwab wrote:cause i have a tendency to get in very heated discussions on this site :)

Come on man. Thats the name of the game on this site!

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:16 pm

grizz wrote:
The Schwab wrote:cause i have a tendency to get in very heated discussions on this site :)

Come on man. Thats the name of the game on this site!

chea, they keep the site going, until they get out of hand

by **grizz** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 4:23 pm

This site would be BORING if people just agreed with each other all the time. Its pretty fun when you get in an intense debate on here. Its just kinda pointless because no one ever wins. haha.

by **knights4** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:36 pm

whatever, i'm 22-4-1 in heated arguments

by **project-pat** » Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:40 pm

knights4 wrote:whatever, i'm 22-4-1 in heated arguments

you wish

Preps HOF

Who is online