Re: Score Updates
Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 4:07 pm
Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
Your source for North Dakota Prep Talk!
http://northdakotapreps.com/
Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
theallaroundballer wrote:Yo madseason, where you at? You plan on coming out of hiding to defend your boys from us big bad commentors?
madseason wrote:Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
No not on bandwagon they will lose to Larimore who will also win state.theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
On the EEK bandwagon now, huh? That didnt take long. Don't worry, though, I'm sure your boys from PR would've given Larimore a run the second time around.
madseason wrote:No not on bandwagon they will lose to Larimore who will also win state.theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
On the EEK bandwagon now, huh? That didnt take long. Don't worry, though, I'm sure your boys from PR would've given Larimore a run the second time around.
theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:No not on bandwagon they will lose to Larimore who will also win state.theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
On the EEK bandwagon now, huh? That didnt take long. Don't worry, though, I'm sure your boys from PR would've given Larimore a run the second time around.
I'm not denying that; Larimore's far and away the best team in A this year. Just pointing out that you were giving EEK no shot this week against Hankey & Co., who were shut down rather easily.
alphadawg wrote:theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:No not on bandwagon they will lose to Larimore who will also win state.theallaroundballer wrote:madseason wrote:Yep! 41-14 now. I think EEK could give Larimore a good game.wan2bqb wrote:34-14 EEK. That may be the nail in the coffin.
On the EEK bandwagon now, huh? That didnt take long. Don't worry, though, I'm sure your boys from PR would've given Larimore a run the second time around.
I'm not denying that; Larimore's far and away the best team in A this year. Just pointing out that you were giving EEK no shot this week against Hankey & Co., who were shut down rather easily.
Your so called beast needed two officials timeouts to be helped off the field. And he coughed the ball up twice. Don't think it was as easy a game as the score indicated.
alphadawg wrote:yes Gruenich put some good hits on Hankey (got up every time). Both teams executed their game plan. EEK's plan was to make Hankey beat them thru the air. Not give him the easy runs. PRFL's plan was to stop Gruenich first. Other then him breaking a couple runs they did. They didn't score either time after his long runs. One was the fumble/strip and the other was a red zone turnover on downs.
It was the EEK supporting cast that stepped up. Hats off to them. Also their coaching staff definitely scouted the Langdon game as they exploited the same things with the hail mary and the halfback pass.
alphadawg wrote:I am not going to argue with you anymore.
you started it all by saying the EEK kid is better on both sides of the ball than the PRFL one.
Then you post the following:
Great points! Agree with almost everything, your points are all valid but i think i would take Gruniech because as coach i think he MAY be a more coachable player, it just my personal opinion, and it would mean i get him on my team next year, lol.
A statement about the character of a player that you apparently know nothing about. My kid has played with Hankey for a lot of years in a couple of sports and that statement is offensive.
then you crow after the game that you were right that Gruenich was the better player.
Then you give us a sermon.
Never thought I'd say this but Go Polar Bears!!!!
alphadawg wrote:I am not going to argue with you anymore.
you started it all by saying the EEK kid is better on both sides of the ball than the PRFL one.
Then you post the following:
Great points! Agree with almost everything, your points are all valid but i think i would take Gruniech because as coach i think he MAY be a more coachable player, it just my personal opinion, and it would mean i get him on my team next year, lol.
A statement about the character of a player that you apparently know nothing about. My kid has played with Hankey for a lot of years in a couple of sports and that statement is offensive.
then you crow after the game that you were right that Gruenich was the better player.
Then you give us a sermon.
Never thought I'd say this but Go Polar Bears!!!!