ClassBEast wrote:Where is everyone's favorite place to run? Who has the nicest track facility?
just a bb fan wrote:That's too easy. BISMARCK!
ClassBEast wrote:just a bb fan wrote:That's too easy. BISMARCK!
OK, let's try a Class B track then.
Also, is Bismarck's track considered "fast?" Why?
carolina blue wrote:[quote="ClassBEast[/user] wrote: [/b]
[b][user=2858]just a bb fan"]That's too easy. BISMARCK!
hazen has a nice facility and so does bowman. but seating isnt the best for parents who want to watch their children long or triple jump or pole vault.
bismarck's track is also used for college so it has a college surface. its a smoother surface compared to a high school track. and also its easier to dig your spikes into the ground on a college track
Ok, I'm pretty sure there is no such thing as a "college surface" and a "high school" surface. The surface at the bowl in bismarck is very thin though, which could make it faster. I'm pretty sure the Fargo South track is made of a mondo surface, which is the fastest in the world. Look for the times at the classic to be fast.
ldrunner wrote:carolina blue wrote:[quote="ClassBEast[/user] wrote: [/b][b][user=2858]just a bb fan"]That's too easy. BISMARCK!
OK, let's try a Class B track then.
Also, is Bismarck's track considered "fast?" Why?
hazen has a nice facility and so does bowman. but seating isnt the best for parents who want to watch their children long or triple jump or pole vault.
bismarck's track is also used for college so it has a college surface. its a smoother surface compared to a high school track. and also its easier to dig your spikes into the ground on a college track
Ok, I'm pretty sure there is no such thing as a "college surface" and a "high school" surface. The surface at the bowl in bismarck is very thin though, which could make it faster. I'm pretty sure the Fargo South track is made of a mondo surface, which is the fastest in the world. Look for the times at the classic to be fast.
ClassBEast wrote:UND had a nice track a "few" years ago when I ran and the state meet was held there every year. Is it still a nice track or why don't they host state anymore?
Oak Grove hosts their meets at Concordia in Moorhead -- also a nice track.
Casselton resurfaced their track last year and put a grandstand in, so it's becoming a nice place to hold a track meet as well.
NDSU's track facility leaves a lot to be desired. I wonder if they will ever upgrade?
ClassBEast wrote:UND had a nice track a "few" years ago when I ran and the state meet was held there every year. Is it still a nice track or why don't they host state anymore?
Oak Grove hosts their meets at Concordia in Moorhead -- also a nice track.
Casselton resurfaced their track last year and put a grandstand in, so it's becoming a nice place to hold a track meet as well.
NDSU's track facility leaves a lot to be desired. I wonder if they will ever upgrade?
nd-ball41 wrote:The track in Grand Forks was really nice to run on...and also the track at Concordia is a pretty fast track & facility.
J-Rod34 wrote:Bismarck is the nicest one in the state because of the facilities. It is a hard track which equals fast times. Other good ones are Devils Lake, UND, NDSU, Kildeer-very fast.
J-Rod34 wrote:Bismarck is the nicest one in the state because of the facilities. It is a hard track which equals fast times. Other good ones are Devils Lake, UND, NDSU, Kildeer-very fast.
carolina blue wrote:hazen has a nice facility and so does bowman. but seating isnt the best for parents who want to watch their children long or triple jump or pole vault.
bismarck's track is also used for college so it has a college surface. its a smoother surface compared to a high school track. and also its easier to dig your spikes into the ground on a college track
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests