thejoker wrote:So much for the Cassel idea.
Patriots franchised him.
BballFan1307 wrote:i thought that we had kinda expected that? i was thinkin they'd try trade for him.
bballfan7 wrote:Dont kid yourself the Vikings arent going to trade for a QB they may draft one in the later rounds but i doubt it Jackson will be the starter next year.
bballfan7 wrote:Dont kid yourself the Vikings arent going to trade for a QB they may draft one in the later rounds but i doubt it Jackson will be the starter next year.
The Schwab wrote:bballfan7 wrote:Dont kid yourself the Vikings arent going to trade for a QB they may draft one in the later rounds but i doubt it Jackson will be the starter next year.
who's going to qb then?
snakeINTHEgrass wrote:vikings are talking to the texans for sage rosenfels
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3928630
NE B-Baller 242 wrote:snakeINTHEgrass wrote:vikings are talking to the texans for sage rosenfels
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3928630
Not a bad cheap option to compete with T-Jack
baseball4life wrote:NE B-Baller 242 wrote:snakeINTHEgrass wrote:vikings are talking to the texans for sage rosenfels
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3928630
Not a bad cheap option to compete with T-Jack
Well, looks like they feel Rosenfels or Jackson is the solution. I, on the other hand, think this was a BAD move, for reasons previously stated, such as, THE TEAM IS BUILT TO WIN NOW, and i just don't see either of these two being and immediate good quarterback. Yes i know, when Jackson came back after being benched he played solid, but look at his playoff performance. Not Good! What i wouldn't give to see Stafford or Sanchez in the Viking Purple!
bballfan7 wrote:baseball4life wrote:NE B-Baller 242 wrote:snakeINTHEgrass wrote:vikings are talking to the texans for sage rosenfels
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3928630
Not a bad cheap option to compete with T-Jack
Well, looks like they feel Rosenfels or Jackson is the solution. I, on the other hand, think this was a BAD move, for reasons previously stated, such as, THE TEAM IS BUILT TO WIN NOW, and i just don't see either of these two being and immediate good quarterback. Yes i know, when Jackson came back after being benched he played solid, but look at his playoff performance. Not Good! What i wouldn't give to see Stafford or Sanchez in the Viking Purple!
Well first you say you thought it was a bad move because the team is ready to win now, then you say you want Stafford or Sanchez, do you really think they will be able step right in there and win? Atleast with Rosenfels you know what you are getting, nothing great but a decent QB once you get in the draft its tough to judge what you are getting there.
BballFan1307 wrote:you guys, lets get real here. Cassell was good because he had Randy Moss, Wes Welker, BIll Bellicheck and Josh McDaniels. Mcnabb is old and would create controversies. Now you think we should bring in some big name qb? Like who?! Its not like they can get Peyton Manning or Phillip Rivers. Their supply is limited. Personally, i wouldve rather had Garcia over Sage, but i think Sage will be fine. Going after a qb in the draft is about a 10 percent chance of success, unless you have a pick in the top 10 and you can get some one good. I think were going to see Sage take the job from Tjack and play respectable.
Return to Open Topics - Sports and other things
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests