The clock was not going to run out on the Bears...
Hinsa wrote:My point is this: whether the Vikings lead was 3 or 6 did not matter. The Bears had tons of time to go down the field and score a touchdown. The only thing the Vikes could have done to ice the game was to go for a touchdown instead of kicking the field goal that put them up 6.
winner-within wrote:Cassels gets the start in London....Loser has to stay in the UK for the rest of the season....
Bison-Vikes #1 wrote:No doubt that Cassel looked good on Sunday. It really seems like the team is behind Cassel much more than Ponder. There were a number of comments made by players mentioning his leadership ability in the huddle and elsewhere. I question Frasier coming out and saying that Ponder is still their starter. Probably the politically correct thing to do, but I think you ride Cassel to the end now. Made quicker decisions and throws and for the most part was very accurate. I still believe Ponder has the tools and is going to be a good QB, just don't think it is going to happen in Minnesota.
ndlionsfan wrote:If they don't trade Cassel or Ponder and get something decent in return, I don't understand adding Freeman.
ndlionsfan wrote:If they don't trade Cassel or Ponder and get something decent in return, I don't understand adding Freeman.
ndlionsfan wrote:They basically have three ok QBs on their roster with a lot of question marks with all of them. I understand taking a chance on Freeman because there is more upside there than with the other two. But to pay him $3 mil to go over the salary cap, meaning they are going to have to get rid of other pieces or restructure contracts, doesn't make sense to me. If you trade one of the other two and at least get a draft pick or some help on the o-line, it makes sense. But to keep three QBs of that caliber on the roster for the rest of the season is stupid.
Return to Open Topics - Sports and other things
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests