Best Defensemen

by **roger411** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:35 am

jkaiz wrote:im surprised Jarrett Galbreath from RR hasnt been mentioned yet

Galbreath and Ladoucer should be mentioned, they are probably the best defensive pair in the state, Galbreath is the kind of de that just plays solid throughout the game and does the little things. Ladoucer is a guy if you give him a chance, he'll rush the puck up and score or give a decent pass to make a quality scoring chance

by **gfhockey** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:10 am

last nite i couldnt count all the times laducer was weavin his way between the williston kids like they were standing still.

by **Csauce123** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 10:04 am

key words "williston kids"

by **HockeyHigh** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:13 pm

Csauce123 wrote:key words "williston kids"

Ouch.

by **The Hockey Wizzard** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 1:48 pm

HockeyHigh wrote:
Csauce123 wrote:key words "williston kids"

Ouch.

it seems to me the "williston kids" did a fairly good job thursday night against the all-mighty Red River. the score was only 4-2, so all the weavin that laducer was doing didn't seem to muster up too many goals.

by **sportsfan1989** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 8:59 pm

The Hockey Wizzard wrote:
HockeyHigh wrote:
Csauce123 wrote:key words "williston kids"

Ouch.

it seems to me the "williston kids" did a fairly good job thursday night against the all-mighty Red River. the score was only 4-2, so all the weavin that laducer was doing didn't seem to muster up too many goals.

No kiddin and it was 3-2 until the last minutes of the game they did pretty well

by **klg_11** » Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:55 pm

ya key words williston kids, i think Red River needs a goalie, o have a pictue the shots were 44 to 9 with williston up 2 to 1. how can u shoot that much and yet be shpt on that little and be losing, ya williston is terrible huh? Red river fans were crappin their pants about that time. red river beat williston by 1, cuz u cant really count the o[pen netter, plus before the game a kid got kicked off the team for tobacco when they were already short defenseman so they only had 3. that equals dead tired at the end of the game. i think williston playd one heck of a game.

by **Ditka14** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 6:36 am

klg_11 wrote:ya key words williston kids, i think Red River needs a goalie, o have a pictue the shots were 44 to 9 with williston up 2 to 1. how can u shoot that much and yet be shpt on that little and be losing, ya williston is terrible huh? Red river fans were crappin their pants about that time. red river beat williston by 1, cuz u cant really count the o[pen netter, plus before the game a kid got kicked off the team for tobacco when they were already short defenseman so they only had 3. that equals dead tired at the end of the game. i think williston playd one heck of a game.

Played one heck of a game yeah, but you can't rely to much on your goalie it should have been a 7-2 game easily if RR could have just put the puck in the net. The only reason it was a good game is because the Williston goalie was playing out of his a** that afternoon. What defenseman got kicked off for catching a smoke?

by **HockeyHigh** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 7:18 am

Ditka14 wrote:What defenseman got kicked off for catching a smoke?

Obviously not a good one if he is 1) Smoking at the state tourney 2) Smoking at all

by **Ditka14** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 7:40 am

HockeyHigh wrote:
Ditka14 wrote:What defenseman got kicked off for catching a smoke?

Obviously not a good one if he is 1) Smoking at the state tourney 2) Smoking at all

haha at least wait till after a game come on. sounds like he is more dedicted to catch a smoke then playing in the first game of the state tournement

by **gfhockey** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 9:47 am

all that matters is the east 4 west 0

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:16 am

no they found a can of chew in his bag in the motel room. it wasnt like he was smokin outside the rink.

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 am

gfhockey wrote:all that matters is the east 4 west 0

alright post number 87 using the same words. why even talk if thats all u ever bring up. thats the only answer u have to everything.

classy

by **Ditka14** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:37 am

klg_11 wrote:no they found a can of chew in his bag in the motel room. it wasnt like he was smokin outside the rink.

haha a little chaw never hurt, im glad he wasn't smoke outside englstad

by **gfhockey** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:42 am

klg_11 wrote:
gfhockey wrote:all that matters is the east 4 west 0

alright post number 87 using the same words. why even talk if thats all u ever bring up. thats the only answer u have to everything.

classy

Alright post number 79. You same the same thing over and over.

BTW, I know a number of RR players last year that chewed while playing. When i reffed, they were spittin out colored saliva. at first i thought it was blood but it was snoose juice.

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:45 am

in state tournament or in a regular game, and did u ever say anything about it, to coaches or anything?

by **gfhockey** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:46 am

JV game. Its not my responsibility to watch them. Thats what the coachers are for.

by **Ditka14** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:58 am

gfhockey wrote:JV game. Its not my responsibility to watch them. Thats what the coachers are for.

I agree with you its not your call to watch what there doing, you have enough on your hands, plus most coaches i couldn't see turning a player.

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:05 am

ya thats true.

Williston head coach dustin bratlein had no problem kickin the kid off. he saw a glimpse of the can and he found it then and kicked the kid off. good player but was never on the best sides with the coach so that could have hurt him a bit.

Honestly though i believe he would have kicked off any player if he saw them with some, hes a friend that way

by **gfhockey** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:08 am

was the kid 18?

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:24 am

im not sure, he is 17 or 18.

by **Ditka14** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:25 am

klg_11 wrote:ya thats true.

Williston head coach dustin bratlein had no problem kickin the kid off. he saw a glimpse of the can and he found it then and kicked the kid off. good player but was never on the best sides with the coach so that could have hurt him a bit.

Honestly though i believe he would have kicked off any player if he saw them with some, hes a friend that way

Personally it could be a bad thing for that coach if it was a invasion of privacy, how did he find it just by glancing or was he digging around?

by **klg_11** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:30 am

from my take on it the kid had it hid and then a corner of it was exposed and when the coach was leaving the room he noticed it.

i dont believe he came into the room looking for the chew

by **gfhockey** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:31 am

if hes 18, shouldnt be a big deal.

If he wasnt chewing while playing, then the coch shouldnt care. I remember when i played kids would sjut put monster chews in on the bus and no one cared.

by **siouxfan4life** » Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:33 am

Wow cmon people chewing, smoking, drinking its against the rules simple as that. Bratlien did exactly what he should have done. It doesn't matter if it is a fourth line player or your best players its called having some morals. The player in question is definately one of Williston's top defensemen. It was disrespect to the coaches as well as his teammates. Williston could have definately used him in that game.

Best Defensemen

Who is online