Csauce123 wrote:What i meant by my statement, just to clarify things is that the goalie from DL must have played a good game.. If there was an EN goal his SP was still close to 90%. I am just saying you can't expect a whole lot more from your goalie against a team with the offensive firepower of South.
DeuceTrey wrote:Csauce123 wrote:What i meant by my statement, just to clarify things is that the goalie from DL must have played a good game.. If there was an EN goal his SP was still close to 90%. I am just saying you can't expect a whole lot more from your goalie against a team with the offensive firepower of South.
Yes, the DL goalie played a great game. only 2 of the 5 south goals were legit goals. one went of the glass behind the net and found its way back infront and into the net. another one was just a little wrister that deflected off of the goalies glove, which should have been an easy save, but just misplayed it, and it fell in. and of course there was the empty netter at the end. but it was a good game to watch, and yes, it was a CLOSE 5-2 game. take away those three goals, youve got yourself a 2-2 game, but lucky goals happen, and thats just how it goes.
DrPepper1 wrote:DeuceTrey wrote:Csauce123 wrote:What i meant by my statement, just to clarify things is that the goalie from DL must have played a good game.. If there was an EN goal his SP was still close to 90%. I am just saying you can't expect a whole lot more from your goalie against a team with the offensive firepower of South.
Yes, the DL goalie played a great game. only 2 of the 5 south goals were legit goals. one went of the glass behind the net and found its way back infront and into the net. another one was just a little wrister that deflected off of the goalies glove, which should have been an easy save, but just misplayed it, and it fell in. and of course there was the empty netter at the end. but it was a good game to watch, and yes, it was a CLOSE 5-2 game. take away those three goals, youve got yourself a 2-2 game, but lucky goals happen, and thats just how it goes.
How bout we just take away all 5 of South's goals so DL wins 2-0. 2-0 is a statement, everybody better watch out for powerhouse DL.
RazorsEdge wrote:WELL PUT SAUCESAUER! Don't hold it against the team because people that haver never put skates on are posting. DL is an OK team. South is an awesome bunch of individuals and if they ever decide to play as a team LOOK OUT.
big_tyme_hockey wrote:I don't get why everyone here is so heck bent on scores.. For example, if what you are saying is true, then is Grafton a bad team since they lost to North once this year as well?
ndfootball wrote:RazorsEdge wrote:WELL PUT SAUCESAUER! Don't hold it against the team because people that haver never put skates on are posting. DL is an OK team. South is an awesome bunch of individuals and if they ever decide to play as a team LOOK OUT.
I dont know if you can even call DL an ok team. Everyone says how bad the west is and DL lost to Jamestown and barely beat minot in overtime by a penelty shot.
DeuceTrey wrote:DrPepper1 wrote:DeuceTrey wrote:Csauce123 wrote:What i meant by my statement, just to clarify things is that the goalie from DL must have played a good game.. If there was an EN goal his SP was still close to 90%. I am just saying you can't expect a whole lot more from your goalie against a team with the offensive firepower of South.
Yes, the DL goalie played a great game. only 2 of the 5 south goals were legit goals. one went of the glass behind the net and found its way back infront and into the net. another one was just a little wrister that deflected off of the goalies glove, which should have been an easy save, but just misplayed it, and it fell in. and of course there was the empty netter at the end. but it was a good game to watch, and yes, it was a CLOSE 5-2 game. take away those three goals, youve got yourself a 2-2 game, but lucky goals happen, and thats just how it goes.
How bout we just take away all 5 of South's goals so DL wins 2-0. 2-0 is a statement, everybody better watch out for powerhouse DL.
im not trying to take anything away from anyone, unlike you and everyone else on this board who has a grudge against DL for no apparent reason. i was just trying to say that the game was closer than the score indicated, and i wasnt making excuses on why DL lost, i was explaining. south played a good game, and is a good team, but DL just had some bad luck that led to some lucky goals for south. thats all i was trying to say.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests